Effective Leadership in Different Waysâ€Free Samples for Students

Question: Discuss About the Effective Leadership in Different Ways? Answer: Introducation A leadership is a function and quality of a person by which a group is influenced to do work for achieving some objectives or targets. Effective leadership essential in order to inspiring the team Accounting to function in order to accomplishment of the given objectives(Yukl, 2008). Leadership adheres force which holds the group intact and develop a team spirit of togetherness. Leadership is a process of influence wherein there is influence on others when they carry out or instructions and accepts his commands, advice, guidance and direction willingly. The successful leaders are able to influence the behavior, attitude and beliefs of their followers. Leadership pattern or style depends on situation. A specific leadership style in one situation at a particular time, may not be appropriate for another situation at a different time(De Vries, 2010). Leadership is the function of encouraging or motivating people to put their best effort willfully to attain the objectives of the organization as interpreted by the leader. General George Smith Patton was a Senior official of the Army of the United States. He was in commanding position in the U.S. Seventh Army in 2nd World War and is immensely famous for his leadership of the U.S. He was one of the most successful field commanders(Brooks, 2016). His character was a complex one it was extremely ruthless, cruel sometimes and unpredictably sentimental at times. He was considered to follow a cognitive or situational leadership style. General Patton followed some particular principles which guided him in his life. Apart from being very strong and stable in physical emotional and mental conditions, he had a powerful spiritual life. Napoleon Bonaparte was the French Emperor and one of the great leaders who crossed the Alps to invade Italy and put high threat on Rome. He was an autocratic leader who would make decisions without discussing with others in his team(Freeman, 2011). This style adopted by him of leadership is mostly used across military approach where leader does not discusses and consults with his subordinates to get any help in decisions. The autocratic leaders are those who are the hard task masters and make authoritative decisions, attempt to solve problems without any discussion or solve problems, makes use of their subordinates as their utilities and then exercise control over their functional activities. The autocratic or authoritative leaders have very high inflated ego. Most of these signs are clear in Napoleon Bonaparte(Walumbwa, 2008). He never used to consult his army for any decision in battle strategies even in cases of last minute decisions. Napoleons decisions were practically oriented and sensible hence the subordinates did not raise questions. In order to get a strong army, Napoleon motivated them by giving hope that someday they would get higher positions. This way was adopted by him to recruit and motivate the team. This shows clear evidence of Napoleons following Herzbergs Hygiene Theory while motivating. As he always promised higher recognition, incentives, status and opportunity such that improvement can be attempted. According to Thomas Hobbes on Lebanthian (updated to modern English) the men are equal in faculties of the mind compared to their physical strength. Prudence is merely an experience thus people need to apply such efforts on themselves that they otherwise would have spent on themselves. The factors which may make such equality unbelievable is really the guiding wrong sense emerging from wisdom, which most men think that, they feel to possess more in common men, which is, generally more compared to anyone apart from for others that they consider worth due to their reputation or because their conformity with them. This is basic human nature which a man might admit that others can be more clever, more articulate or more knowledgeable compared to him. Then he will not easily consider others as wise as he is from his judgmental understanding. He realize his own wisdom closely and other mens from a distance(Zhang, 2011). Drawing from several researches and papers it can be said that it depi cts equality of men compared inequality. By considering the above mentioned cases the following inferences can be drawn:- George Smith Patton considered to follow a cognitive or situational leadership style apart from being very strong and stable in physical emotional and mental conditions, he had a powerful spiritual life. This indicates that, not only bodily strength and courage but mental and spiritual strength also played a desired vital roles in his case. Herzbergs Hygiene Theory while motivating he used to promise to his followers higher recognition, incentives, status and opportunity for improvement. Hertzberg Hygiene theory has two aspects one of which is health and another is hygiene. While hygiene cannot motivate an individual, but acts as basics on basis of which performance is conducted. Napoleon used to follow autocratic or strict authoritarian leadership style and Herzbergs Hygiene Theory while motivating could provide better recognition, status, incentives along with opportunities for development. An authoritarian leadership style is regarded as a way in which a leader dictates policies in accordance to set goals, while having a control over achieving and directing such activities. Authoritarian leaders set clear expectations as to what needs to be done and he allocates responsibilities and duties accordingly. There is a stringent control over authoritarian leaders by means of regulating duties, actions, methodologies and so on. There is a little creative nature associated with such leadership styles for decision making(Duignan, 2009). These types of leadership is out of style and is not followed now. They exert supervisions at all times and offer little help in discussing out of problems in situations. According to Thomas Hobbes on Lebanthian Prudence is merely an experience therefore men are expected to have an equal amount ofit within an equal time spent on stuff that they regularly apply themselves to. Autocratic leadership styles are much more effective than collaborative ones if the above cases are considered. They generally exercise downward control and one-way communication on their followers and subordinates. They intend to control discussion amongst followers and does not entertain relationship building amongst them, thus utilizing conflicts for individual gains. Reference Lists Brooks, J. S. (2016). Everything we know about educational leadership is wrong. . Questioning leadership: New directions for educational organizations. London: Routledge. De Vries, R. E.-P. (2010). Leadership= communication? The relations of leaders communication styles with leadership styles, knowledge sharing and leadership outcomes. Journal of businessand psychology, 367-380. Duignan, P. . (2009). Authenticity in leadership: An emerging perspective. Authenticity in leadership: An emerging perspective., 354-369. Freeman, R. E. (2011). Values, authenticity, and responsible leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 15-23. Walumbwa, F. O. (2008). Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of management, 89-126. Yukl, G. (2008). How leaders influence organizational effectiveness. The leadership quarterly, 708-722. Zhang, X. A. (2011). Linking transformational leadership and team performance: A conflict management approach. Journal of Management Studies, 1586-1611.